or night of the living dead or any other zombie sequal !!!!

ps dont reply if your from england

ps dont reply if your from england
arsehole , and there planning a Evil Dead 4 :)

28 Days later...Gotta love a multimillion dollar fucking pepsi commercial.

As for dawn of the Dead, they already made a sequel to that sequel. It's called Land of the Dead.

or any other zombie sequal !!!!

28 DAYS LATER IS NOT A ZOMBIE FILM, YOU FUCKIN' JACKASS.

arsehole , and there planning a Evil Dead 4 :)

thats bullshit. get new sources. they're planning an evil dead REMAKE. not a sequal. bruce campbell has told fans this a thousand times. get it straight.

as for DOTD, i'm sure george remero will pull something out of his ass or the guy who did the (much better) remake will do a sequal to that.

the guy from 28 days later (which IS a zombie movie, despite what certain nitpicky people say) is currently working on the much anticipated Halo movie. scripting it for something like 10 million american.

if you want a zombie fix, go to your local video store and pick any one of the hundreds of shitty homage films, indy cult horror films, lame rip offs or college splatter-flicks. because horror geek film makers have been shitting out zombie movies since DOTD and ED2 came out like those films where rip-off laxatives.

28 Days Later is not a zombie film in any sense. It's not a matter of being nitpickey it is simply the fact of the matter...

thats bullshit. get new sources. they're planning an evil dead REMAKE. not a sequal. bruce campbell has told fans this a thousand times. get it straight.

A lot of people will argue and say that Evil Dead 2 was billed as a sequal but was in fact a REMAKE, considering that, a second remake can be called ED4 at your own discression and considering the fact that it is the 4th ED film being made...
What I'm trying to say is that remake or sequal or what ever it is still ED4.

A lot of people will argue and say that Evil Dead 2 was billed as a sequal but was in fact a REMAKE, considering that, a second remake can be called ED4 at your own discression and considering the fact that it is the 4th ED film being made...
What I'm trying to say is that remake or sequal or what ever it is still ED4.

No, its not. Raimi isnt directing, campbell isnt starring and its plot is the exact same as the original '81 release. its not Evil Dead 4.
evil dead 2 was billed as a sequal because it WAS a sequal. different plot, same actors, bigger budget. ED2 has a different ending, a smaller cast. like how Desperado is considered a sequal to El Mariachi despite the fact that its really a remake which uses only some elements of the original plot as a backstory.
the remake of evil dead is simply called Evil Dead, not Evil Dead 4. its a remake, not a sequal in any way. just like how Peter Jackson is remaking King Kong, its in no way a sequal to the '33 original.

i've followed this franchise most of my life, i never liked star wars that much and this was my alternative cult trilogy. i've also been following the progression of this remake since day one, and Raimi and Campbell have both stated that there will never be an Evil Dead 4, the trilogy is just that, a trilogy, and a fourth in the series would be pointless and to be blunt- a little much.

28 Days Later is not a zombie film in any sense. It's not a matter of being nitpickey it is simply the fact of the matter...
its a zombie film. i dont care that they turn because of a desease, or they don't groan and shuffle. they are zombies, mindless savage killers with rotting flesh and a taste for the living. the film makers bill it as a zombie flick, the general public reffers to it as a zombie film, its a fucking zombie film.

if it walks like a duck and talks like a duck. its a fucking duck, kids. and monkeys infected with rage is the stupidest concept since "hey, i'll bet people wanna know what ever happened to those girls from charlies angels... i think a sequal is in order."

They don't have rotting flesh, they are not dead, they never were they can't be zombies. I never saw this film billed as a zombie film.
Also your "walks like a duck, talks like a duck" thing doesn't hold true for your steriotypical zombie because, as you say yourself, they don't groan or shuffle. The link you make is about as strong as the old python consept of if it floats it's made of wood and therefor if it weighs the same as a duck ect ect...
Also could you please give me a sourse of Sam saying there will never be an ED4, I know this is a remake which Sam has generously decided to give over to an unknown, but as far as I am aware Sam and Ted were still thinking about ED4 with Bruce...
I remember Bruce saying he would like to close the book on Ash in an interview after the new game but I've never heard any of them state that there will not be an ED4.

www.bruce-campbell.com aughtta do it.

oh for christs' sake. its a zombie film. its known world wide as a zombie film, its been called a zombie film by the fucking film makers.
ITS
A
ZOMBIE
MOVIE
and a shitty one at that.

you guys are almost as bad as the IMDB boards.

I quite like the film, well I quite like watching Cillian just lose it at the end but that's beside the point. I for one will never see 28 days later as a zombie film for the reasons I have stated so we will have to agree to disagree on it.
And www.bruce-campbell.com is hardly a great source for the "there will never be an ED4" argument when it says "We all want to do another sequel, but it's more about the calendar than anything - mostly Sam's. It's a "wait and see" right now."

"you guys are almost as bad as the IMDB boards."
I resent that.

i said Almost.

Pakx , sorry about my lack of understanding , i saw quick refrence ages ago saying stuff about Evil Dead 4 , i havent looked into it deep , ive only saw "blah blah blah evil dead 4" sorry , easy mistake todo , sorry if i have upset you

lol, dude you havent upset me its a movie, not my mothers heart surgery, a mistake is allowed.

Tell me if I ever do get as bad as the IMDB boards, though I do frequent them, for it is that day I will wish to end my life...

oh for christs' sake. its a zombie film. its known world wide as a zombie film, its been called a zombie film by the fucking film makers.

I've never heard it called a zombie film in this country. Maybe in the US and Canada, but not here.

And I don't recall Danny Boyle ever saying it was a zombie film. Ever.

"When I read it, the first draft that Alex wrote had this fantastic idea in it -- the cliche of a virus escaping from a laboratory but there was this twist on it; it was a psychological virus, which lifts it away from the biological realm. Also, the film concerns social rage as a phenomenon, certainly in Britain.

This was around the time of foot-and-mouth disease, which doesn't affect human beings, but it did lead to these Biblical images of cows and livestock being slaughtered in the millions."

Also, definition of zombie = A reanimated corpse. They never died whilst being infected. Therefore it was not a zombie movie.

Also, definition of zombie = A reanimated corpse. They never died whilst being infected. Therefore it was not a zombie movie.
so would that mean Resident Evil 1 & 2 arent zombie films? in resident evil 1 , there gassed.. resident evil 2... there bitten... very confusing :(

They die in Resident Evil though...

As far as I can remember from RE, they are. Somebody released the T-virus, so the computer killed everyone as a precaution. The virus then reanimated them.

Or am I remembering a different film altogether?

No that's exactly what happened.

28 DAYS LATER IS NOT A ZOMBIE FILM, YOU FUCKIN' JACKASS.
its catorgorized as a zombie movie so just shut the fuck up no england fucks reply

That doesn't make it a zombie film, you idiot.

its catorgorized as a zombie movie so just shut the fuck up no england fucks reply

What do you have against English people?

im talking about the thread name and that your arguing with it

BECAUSE EVERYTIME I FUCKING MAKE A THREAD THEY FUCKING ARGUE WITH ME !!

Maybe you should gain some intelligence before you try posting, then?

plus you said no english people .... american i presume?

Also all England people are fucking smartasses and think we should spell like a genius on the internet

theres no such thing as "England people" theres English & British People.... and ffs ¬_¬

hang on , ill get a list of soon to be horror films ¬__¬

also... are you above the age of 18? , i dont think you should watch horror films as they seem to make you worse ¬__¬

"Day of the Dead" is apparently in the works...only zombie one i can find...


also..found sumit about these classics


Beetljuice 2
The Goonies 2
& Die Hard 4

a remake of day of the dead? really?! hmm, maybe it'll take place in mexico. Anyway, RaiderDawg. you're an idiot and a bigot. shove a limey dick in your mouth and shut the fuck up.

28 DAYS LATER IS NOT A ZOMBIE FILM, YOU FUCKIN' JACKASS.



Well said!

a remake of day of the dead? really?! hmm, maybe it'll take place in mexico.
just incase the original jackass said "OH NOEZ I KNOWZ MOREZ ABOUT DA |ZOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMBIEEEEES TAHN U DU!! N TERE IZ NOEZ DAY DEAD!!!" http://www.killermovies.com/d/dayofthedead/articles/5587.html << linky to where i saw it

can i just settle this is it isn't it a zombie film argument........

28 day's later is not a zombie film, zombie's are re-animated corpse's. the "infected" did not in actual fact die, therefore it can't be a zombie film. end of discussion under educated american scum

ps dont reply if your from england

Why the fuck not??
ill reply if i wanna yank..
28 days later was an awsum movie, much better than dawn of the dead etc...

oh and it wasn't a zombie movie....

u ...u ... u prat, yea i said it!

http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:UDoQLro-LGIJ:images.amazon.com/images/P/B0000639EC.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

^^^^ Yank **** ^^^^

http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:UDoQLro-LGIJ:images.amazon.com/images/P/B0000639EC.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
point being?

http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:UDoQLro-LGIJ:images.amazon.com/images/P/B0000639EC.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

The point of that image is? You've found out abouit a very old movie?

For the record yall a zombie by definition is a corpse supposedly revived/reanimated through witchcraft OR simply a person resembling such; dull or apathetic - that is they are without any real emotional state. So really 28 Days later is as many say, not a zombie movie, they are not deceased and they sure as hell aren't apathetic. They don't even eat flesh like Romero zombies so despite some popular belief, they ain't really zombies are they...

As well for the whole Evil Dead remake and Evil Dead 4... They're supposed to be doing both, you know? The profits for the remake are supposedly meant to fund an Evil Dead 4.

For the record yall a zombie by definition is a corpse supposedly revived/reanimated through witchcraft OR simply a person resembling such; dull or apathetic - that is they are without any real emotional state. So really 28 Days later is as many say, not a zombie movie, they are not deceased and they sure as hell aren't apathetic. They don't even eat flesh like Romero zombies so despite some popular belief, they ain't really zombies are they...

okay, seriously it doesnt matter one bit. its still a freaking zombie movie. the film makers reffer to it as a zombie movie, the general public reffers to it as a zombie movie, its a zombie movie, Granted- a new twist on zombies, but still a freaking zombie movie, kids. i've already stated my fears that this will become another IMDB style pointless arguement so i'm closing the book now. its a zombie movie, i dont care about superfluous technicalities, its a zombie movie. By the way, that apathetic and dull thing is crap too, as the zombies in DOTD (2004) where angry, fast and STILL ZOMBIES!!!!

As well for the whole Evil Dead remake and Evil Dead 4... They're supposed to be doing both, you know? The profits for the remake are supposedly meant to fund an Evil Dead 4.

thats bull too, Evil Dead 4 became a video game called Hail To The King. the only evil dead film in the works is Evil Dead (remake) probably because these are cult films and a sequal would have very little box office draw, but a remake loaded with contemporary stars would attract both the general public and fans, scrutinous or otherwise (mostly for the sake of curiousity.)

to be honest ,on the zombie subject , who gives a fuck people¬__¬ , if you think its a zombie , its a zombie

I hope The Evil Dead isn't going to be packed with the stars of today. I would much prefere to see unknowns take it on, as far as I know the director will be an unknown and if he pulls it off it will, no doubt, be a huge break for him. So ye I'd like to see it be a break for some unknown actors as well.

i dont care about superfluous technicalities, its a zombie movie.

I'd hardly say that the definition of a zombie was an unnecessary technicality in defining zombies.

People say inaccurate things all the time. It doesn't make them true.

Example - If everyone turned around and said that Johnny Depp was black, would that make him black? No. He is obviously white.

highly doubt it, first off, nobody wants to be known as the poor mans sam raimi.... Sam Raimi is the poor mans sam raimi.

second, i've heard Ashton Kutcher is gonna step into Bruce Campbells pants, so you know this thing is gonna suck. my biggest fear is that if this movie is successful, you KNOW they'll remake 1000 other cult films, El Mariachi starring Wilmur Valdoramma, Memento starring Tom Cruise, Rocky Horror Picture Show starring Robbie Williams, you name it.

I'd hardly say that the definition of a zombie was an unnecessary technicality in defining zombies.

People say inaccurate things all the time. It doesn't make them true.

Example - If everyone turned around and said that Johnny Depp was black, would that make him black? No. He is obviously white.


Dude, already said- closing the book on it, don't care anymore, i'm with Conker other there, nobody really cares, lets not plummet into an IMDB thread. agree to disagree, live and let live, all o' that.

Oh, Jesus, it's IMDB mark II.

I apologise in a most humble manner.

Oh, Jesus, it's IMDB mark II.

I apologise in a most humble manner.


that's the problem with you brits, i can never tell if you're being sarcastic or not.

that's the problem with you brits, i can never tell if you're being sarcastic or not.

its a gift that only *us brits* are born with :)

yes , and candians have the fittest girls ive ever seen :-/

highly doubt it, first off, nobody wants to be known as the poor mans sam raimi.... Sam Raimi is the poor mans sam raimi.

second, i've heard Ashton Kutcher is gonna step into Bruce Campbells pants, so you know this thing is gonna suck. my biggest fear is that if this movie is successful, you KNOW they'll remake 1000 other cult films, El Mariachi starring Wilmur Valdoramma, Memento starring Tom Cruise, Rocky Horror Picture Show starring Robbie Williams, you name it.

I think with a film like The Evil Dead a big budget and big name stars are a formula for disaster. I've heard the Ashton talk as well I just pray it won't come to pass...

A lot of people will argue and say that Evil Dead 2 was billed as a sequal but was in fact a REMAKE, considering that, a second remake can be called ED4 at your own discression and considering the fact that it is the 4th ED film being made...
What I'm trying to say is that remake or sequal or what ever it is still ED4.

Evil Dead 2 was not a remake. It told a different story than the first one.

oh and Dawn of the Dead has two sequels, and i believe they are remaking day of the dead.

There is a sequel coming out in 2007 to 28 Days Later called 28 weeks later. That cast has not been announced though.